![nighthawk x8 r8500 review nighthawk x8 r8500 review](https://cdn.hightechdad.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/1447258034_thumb.png)
We set out to check the effectiveness of link aggregation with the Netgear R8500 and Netgear ReadyNAS RN214, and we are pleased with the user-friendliness of the whole process. Note that each stream managed between 400 Mbps and 500 Mbps only despite a link rate of 1300 Mbps.
#NIGHTHAWK X8 R8500 REVIEW DOWNLOAD#
We managed to sustain close to gigabit speeds over wireless (over two 5 GHz channels) for the multi-client upload and download cases. The performance in this case was much better. We also cut down the number of clients from three to two (one to each bridging router). Ideally, we should also have had a third router in bridge mode to connect to the 2.4 GHz band, but we decided to test out with bridging on just the two 5 GHz SSIDs. So, we shifted to using two Netgear Nighthawk R7000 routers in bridge mode, with each one connecting to one of the 5 GHz SSIDs. Could the second SSID help in driving up the throughput numbers? The R8500 in bridge mode was obviously not performing well. It must be noted that the bridged R8500 connects only to one of the 5 GHz SSIDs. Apparently, we were not the only people to notice this issue, leading me to believe that there is still plenty of scope for performance improvements in the R8500. While we did see occasional bursts of more than 800 Mbps during the testing, the majority of the time was spent in the 100 Mbps range. To our consternation, the results from running our folder download / upload test were downright abysmal. The wired PCs connected to ports 3,4 and 5 of the main router were shifted to ports 1,2 and 3 of the bridging R8500. Eventually, we settled down on keeping the bridging router around 10 ft away, but, across a drywall (in order to simulate realistic conditions). Irrespective of where we placed the bridging router relative to the main R8500, we found that the link rate never reached 2165 Mbps, but topped out at 1733 Mbps. In order to test out this aspect, we configured another R8500 in bridge mode (this is necessary to test 4x4 Wi-Fi bridging at the maximum possible link rate because 1024-QAM works only with other Broadcom devices, and the R8500 is the only Broadcom device that also has 4x4 capabilities). This naturally leads consumers to wonder whether it is really possible to get gigabit Wi-Fi (considering that an AC5300 router should theoretically support up to 2165 Mbps on each of the 5 GHz bands). We included one of these in the test as a comparison.The Nighthawk X8 R8500 is marketed as an AC5300-class router. Which is a bit Spinal Tap.įor comparison, the last generation of super routers was called AC3200 and supported a 3,200Mb/s throughput. Linksys cheekily rounds this up to 5,400 and calls the same thing AC5400. This comes from having a three network bands in each router – one 2.4GHz network (1000Mb/s) and two 5GHz networks (2166Mb/s each). The 5300 refers to 5,300Mb/s theoretical throughput. We tested for performance, features and value before delivering our verdict. These are impossible to test for directly but overall performance, in our challenging, real-world test environment gave us a good idea of what to expect from each of them.
![nighthawk x8 r8500 review nighthawk x8 r8500 review](https://dygtyjqp7pi0m.cloudfront.net/i/35858/31836454_1.jpg)
All of them claim to have special features for added stability, reliability and load balancing and all have different names for them. It’s not too surprising though, these are expensive machines which mostly do the same things using similar components – so marketing will always take over. And looking at some of them, you wouldn’t be surprised if they did. Now that we’re at $600, AC5300 routers with MU-MIMO technology and multiple antennae, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see, “ability to fly” in the specs sheets.
![nighthawk x8 r8500 review nighthawk x8 r8500 review](https://www.cnet.com/a/img/hub/2015/10/30/20652186-020e-4ba6-8f4e-7f6a03050646/netgearr8500-2.jpg)
On top of this, the marketing materials and claims by router manufacturers become more hyperbolic with each product evolution. There’s very much a YMMV (your mileage may vary) element about them as performance depends on so many factors including location, surrounding building(s), interference from nearby devices and even time of day. Testing WiFi routers is something of a unique challenge.